insanojackson said:
modified or inaccurate dyno or conversion calculation?
The Juke is totally standard-running on V Power.
With motoring journalists reporting that the Juke feels much quicker than its official 0-60 time of 8 seconds, I was intrigued to see what the DiG-T was really producing.
Agreed, variables can affect Dyno results and are best used to measure the performance gains of modifications by comparing before and after data on that particular vehicle.<?: prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com

ffice

ffice" /><O

></O

>
However, it is not uncommon for modern turbo cars to achieve better than advertised BHP. Nissanjukebox’s DiG-Tmade 217 BHP (with a k&N filter),on a hub Dyno. Before its remap, my old 130 BHP Fabia vRS made 143 BHPon Tescos diesel and a binding brake LOL - while most were around 150 BHP!TSI engines also produce more than quoted.
<?: prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com

ffice

ffice" /><O

></O

>
I have no reason to doubt Starperformance or the accuracy of their rolling road. They are a highly regarded award winning independent Audi VW group tuner.
<H1 style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; MARGIN: auto 0cm"><I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">
“The MAHA All Wheel Drive Dynamometer is arguably the best, most accurate automotive performance tester in the world today. It is the choice for many automobile manufactures for development and final testing at the factory”.[/I]</H1>
<H1 style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; MARGIN: auto 0cm">
<H1 style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; LINE-HEIGHT: 115%; MARGIN: 5pt 0.75pt">The owner is impressed with the Juke’s engine; he is going to investigate its tuning ability....if he finds anything he will post it on his web-site. I mentioned that he would be on to a winner even if he could import a few Stillen exhausts!<O

></O

></H1></H1>
<H1 style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; MARGIN: auto 0cm"></H1>
<O

></O

>
Edited by: Mez